Power Over Architecture

A Case Study on Malay Sultanate Palaces in West Kalimantan During Colonial Period (1800-1949 AD)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/ijeas.2023.3.02.96-105

Keywords:

architecture, colonial, Malay sultanate, palaces, power

Abstract

The notion of power, characterized by its ability to wield influence over others as guided by its holder’s intention, is intertwined with a spectrum of social control mechanisms encompassing force, coercion, manipulation, seduction, and authority. Malay sultanate palaces in West Kalimantan were a form of architecture hinggil (high) culture. The historical development of Malay ethnics in West Kalimantan is linked to power dynamics. This study investigates the historical development of Malay Sultanate palaces’ spatial configurations and architectural designs. It focuses on the colonial era, during which power dynamics exerted significant influence. This paper aims to ascertain the extent to which power dynamics have shaped the architectural aspects of the Malay Sultanate palaces. The analysis highlights the architectural objects and employs a historical methodology with diachronic and synchronic analyses to discern the patterns of power prevalent throughout the Sultanate’s history. Power is palpably demonstrated in effecting substantial transformations in the intent and function of the sultanate palaces, often through manipulation, seduction, and assertion of authority. These power dynamics are exemplified through architectural modifications, i.e., the controleur strategic placement and fort within the Sultanate’s vicinity, interior space reconfigurations, alterations in functionality, and symbolic embellishments reflecting the Sultanate’s authority. The colonial administration from the Dutch regime embarked on fortifying its dominion through modifications to the functional underpinnings of the palace chambers. The Dutch authority’s influence facilitated the consolidation and validation of their control. These mechanisms engendered compliance and acquiescence to the dominion of the ruling party through latent means.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adelaar,K. (2004). Where does Malay come from? Twenty years of discussions about homeland, migrations and classifications, In: Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 160(1), 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003733

Altomonte, S., Allen, J., Bluyssen, P. M., Brager, G., Heschong, L., Loder, A., Schiavon, S., Veitch, J. A., Wang, L., & Wargocki, P. (2020). Ten Questions Concerning Well-Being in the Built Environment. Building and Environment, 180(August 2020), 106949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106949

Andaya, L. Y, (2001). The Search for the ‘Origin’ of Melayu, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 32 (3), pp 315-330, October 2001, The National University of Singapore. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20072349

Aryodiguno, H. (2020). Embedded Anti-Chinese Orientations: The Dutch Occupation and Its Legacies. In C. Shih, P. Manomaivibool, M. Tanigaki, & S. Singh (Eds.), Colonial legacies and contemporary studies of China and Chineseness: Unlearning binaries, strategizing self (pp. 121–145). World Scientific.

Bellwood, P.(1995). Austronesian Prehistory in Southeast Asia: Homeland, Expansion and Transformation. In P. Bellwood, J. J. Fox, & D. Tryon (Eds.), The Austronesians: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. (pp. 103-118) Canberra: Department of Anthropology, The Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies.

Coedes, G. (2010). Asia Tenggara Masa Hindu-Buddha. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Arkeologi Nasional.

Collins, J. T. (2011). Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Dunia. Leiden: KITLV Press.

Dovey, K.(1999). Framing Palces (mediating Power in Built Form, Routledge, Londong and New York

Firmansyah, H. (2019). Heritage Kota Pontianak Sebagai Sumber Belajar Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah. Masa: Journal of History, 1(2), 94-108. https://doi.org/10.31571/masa.v1i2.1433

Firmansyah, H., Noor, A. S., & Chalimi, I. R. (2021). Penggunaan Biografi Sultan Syarif Abdurrahman Alkadrie Sebagai Sumber Pembelajaran Sejarah. Agastya: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Pembelajarannya, 11(2), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.25273/ajsp.v11i2.8005

Foucault, M. (2002). Power/Knowledge. Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya.

Gunawan, I., Soemardiono, B., & Septanti, D. (2022). Typology of Settlement Development in Riverbanks in Pontianak. International Journal of Environment, Architecture, and Societies, 2(02), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.26418/ijeas.2022.2.02.73-84

Haryanti, S. U. (2023). The Treaty of Tumbang Anoi, 1894: Impact on Borneo’s Social Structure. In M. Budianta & S. Tiwon (Eds.), Trajectories of Memory (pp. 61–75). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1995-6_4

Ibrahim, M. S. (2010). Tradisi dan Komunikasi Orang Melayu. Pontianak: Stain Pontianak Press.

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia (2002). Inventarisasi Istana-istana di Kalimantan Barat. Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Provinsi Kalimantan Barat.

Lontaan, J.U. (1975). Sejarah, Hukum Adat, dan Adat Istiadat Kalimantan-Barat. Pontianak: Pilindo.

Madjid, M. D., & Wahyudi, J. (2021). Stability above Instability: Trade and Anti-Colonialization in Sukadana in XIX Century. Tawarikh, 12(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.2121/tawarikh.v12i2.1436

Mamat, M. J., & Abdul Aziz, M. F. (2020). The Entity—Identity Relationships of Old Shop Houses in Perak Through Facade Design. Planning Malaysia, 18(13), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i13.775

Miller, D., & Telly, C. (1984). Ideology, Power, and Prehistory: An Introduction. In Miller, D., & Tilley, C. (Ed.). Ideology, Power, and Prehistory. (pp.1-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Milner, A. C. (2009). The Malays. Wileyy Blackwell.

Nothofer, B. (1996). Migrasi orang Melayu purba: Kajian awal. The Fourth Biennial Conference of the Borneo Research Council. Bandar Seri Begawan.

Setiadi, D. H. (2022). Building Practice in the Dutch East Indies: Epistemic Imposition at the Beginning of the 20th Century. Taylor & Francis.

Sirrullah, S. B. S. (2019). History of Kadriah Sultanate Pontianak 1778-2017 M [Undergraduate, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya]. http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/29237/

Smith, F. A. (2021). How Many Polities Called Tanjungpura Have There Been in Borneo? Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 94(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2021.0024

Syafei, M. (2020, September 8). Esensi ‘Istana Alwatzikhoebillah’ di Pilkada Sambas 2020. Kompasiana. https://www.kompasiana.com/jurnalisme-warga-sambas/5f56c38ed541df7e39779573/esensi-istana-atwazikhoebillah-di-pilkada-sambas-2020

Utami, N. (2020). Eksistensis Orang—Orang Cina Di Kalimantan Barat. Karmawibangga: Historical Studies Journal, 2(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.31316/fkip.v2i1.327

Wan, S. H. (2022). Disciplining Otherness in the Tropics: Dutch Philanthropic Sites and the Urbanization of Indonesian Ports, 1640–1730. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 81(4), 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2022.81.4.420

Yuan, L. J. (1987). The Malay House: Rediscovery Malaysia’s Indegenous Shelter System. Penang: The Phonix Press.

Zain, Z., & Putro, J. D. (2021). Conservation Identifications on Wooden Structures of the Traditional Dwellings in West Kalimantan: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Science, Technology, and Modern Society (ICSTMS 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210909.039

Zain, Z., Irwin, I., & Andi, U. F. (2023). Action on Heritage Conservation of Wooden Structures: Enhancing the Cultural Spaces of Pontianak by Reconstruction of a Traditional Malay House. International Journal of Environment, Architecture, and Societies, 3(01), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.26418/ijeas.2023.3.01.34-43

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Andi, U. F., Irwin, I., Zain, Z., Pebriano, V., & Andi, A. (2023). Power Over Architecture: A Case Study on Malay Sultanate Palaces in West Kalimantan During Colonial Period (1800-1949 AD). International Journal of Environment, Architecture, and Societies, 3(02), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.26418/ijeas.2023.3.02.96-105