A Tale of Two “Rumah”

State, Market and Two Austronesian Communities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/ijeas.2021.1.01.31-45

Keywords:

house, Iban, Paiwan, Serawak Dyake, Taiwan indigenous

Abstract

In this paper, I will juxtapose the socio-economic histories of two Austronesian communities in order to highlight the working of a key cultural concept, “house” or rumah, in both communities in the face of encroaching contemporary state and market forces. The communities under consideration are an Iban longhouse community of Sarawak and a Paiwan community of Southern Taiwan. Both group honored a kind of precedence in terms of land occupancy and the utilization of natural resources. Both group follow a rather fundamental cognatic principle in kinship recognition, household division and property transmission. While a comprehensive comparison of the two on so complex a subject is apparently way beyond the scope of a conference paper, I choose here to focus on the interplay of state policy (both colonial and independent) and market force on land tenure and land utilization among the two communities, and hope to demonstrate the upholding of the notion umah as a value in these peoples modernization strategies. Even though the contents, scopes and representations of the notion of “House” are different in these two societies, its centralities in their respective social and cultural systems are fascinatingly comparable. I do not intent to say that these two local communities of the Austronesian experience no difficulties whatsoever in their ever-increasing involvement in the national, regional and global systems.  From what we observe, however, we do see that they are not just surviving the encroaching external impacts, they continue to exist as two “rumah”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bellwood, P. (1985). Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago. Sydney: Academic Press.

Chiang, B. (1993). House and Social Hierarchy of the Paiwan. [PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania].

Errington, S. (1989). Meaning and Power in a Southeast Asian Realm. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Fox, J. J. (Ed.). (1980). The Flow of Life: Essays on Eastern Indonesia. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Freeman, D. (1992). The Iban of Borneo. Kuala Lumpur: S. Abdul Majeed & Co.

Jensen, E. (1974). The Iban and their Religion. Oxford: Claredon.

Kaur, A. (1998). Economic Change in East Malaysia: Sabah and Sarawak since 1850. New York: St. Martin’s.

Kedit, P. M. (1993). Iban Bejalai. Kuala Lumpur: Sarawak Literary Society.

Kua, C. (2001). The Aborigine Landlord: Ethnic Politics and Aborigine Lan Rights in Qing Taiwan. Taipei: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1982). The Way of the Masks (trans. S. Modelski). London: Johathan Cape.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1987). Anthropology and Myth: Lectures 1951-1982. Oxford: Blackwell.

Macdonald, C. (Ed.). (1987). De la hutte au palais: sociétés “à maisons” en Asie du Sud-Est insulaire. Paris: Editions du CNRS.

McKinnon, S. (1991) From a Shattered Sun: Hierarchy, Gender, and Alliance in the Tanimbar Islands, Madison. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

Ooi, K. G. (1997). Of Free Trade and Native Interests: the Brookes and the Economic Development of Sarawak, 1841-1941. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Porritt, V. L. (1997). British Colonial Rule in Sarawak: 1946-1963. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Sandin, B. (1957). The Sea Dayak Migration to Niah River. Sarawak Museum Journal, 8(10), 133-35.

Sandin, B. (1967). The Sea Dayaks of Borneo: Before White Rajah Rule. Michigan State University Press.

Shepherd, J. (1993). Statedraft and Political Economy on the Taiwan Frontier, 1600-1800. Taipei: SMC Publishing.

Sutlive, V. H. (1978). The Iban of Sarawak. Arlington Heights, Ill, AHM Publishing Corporation.

Waterson, R. (1990). The Living House: an Anthropology of Architecture in Southeast Asia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

How to Cite

Chiang, B. (2021). A Tale of Two “Rumah”: State, Market and Two Austronesian Communities. International Journal of Environment, Architecture, and Societies, 1(01), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.26418/ijeas.2021.1.01.31-45